What a certification mark actually certifies
A mark is a narrow, specific promise. This page states, mark by mark, exactly what each one tests and what it deliberately leaves untested — so you can interrogate the datasheets we link to, and anyone else's.
- Register entries
- 14
- Evidence verdicts published
- 4
- ASEAN markets served
- 3
Three rules that survive any datasheet
Nothing here is specific to our catalog. These are the questions to put to any certification claim, from any supplier.
A mark is a scope, not a grade
Certification is not a ranking. Each mark tests a defined property against a defined method, and says nothing at all about the properties it did not test. Two products carrying the same mark can be very differently suited to your duty.
Potable supplyA listing covers a model family, not a brand
Certification attaches to specific models in a specific configuration, recorded in the certifier's listing database. A manufacturer holding a listing does not put that listing on every product it sells.
Process waterAn absence is a question about duty
A missing mark is usually a scope fact rather than a deficiency. The question is not whether the mark is present but whether the duty requires it — an irrigation filter has no reason to carry a drinking-water materials listing.
IrrigationThe marks you will meet, one by one
Every entry uses the same three fields. The marks with no publicly listed product are explained too — you need the standard whether or not we stock it.
- Covers
- Materials and components in contact with drinking water do not leach contaminants at levels that pose a health risk.
- Does not cover
- Treatment performance, contaminant reduction, mechanical safety, or any microbial claim.
- Scope
- The materials-safety standard most commonly cited where an accredited testing chain is required. WRAS and ACS are analogues rather than equivalents, and acceptance of a given scheme is decided per project and per authority — confirm before specifying.
- Covers
- UV disinfection system performance, graded Class A (disinfection of contaminated water) or Class B (supplemental treatment of water already deemed potable).
- Does not cover
- Any chemical or particulate reduction. It evaluates the system's own wetted materials, not the materials of the wider installation — that is NSF/ANSI 61.
- Scope
- The class matters more than the mark. Class B is not a microbiological barrier, so a specification that names NSF/ANSI 55 without naming the class leaves the duty ambiguous.
Not on the public catalog today — project-specified, available on request.
- Covers
- Cation-exchange softener performance — hardness reduction, rated salt efficiency, and the safety of materials in contact with the water.
- Does not cover
- Contaminant reduction beyond hardness, except the barium and radium claims a listing may name individually.
- Scope
- Scoped to residential cation-exchange softeners — a listing is not in-scope evidence for an industrial unit. Hardness is a scaling and process problem rather than a health one, so the mark says nothing about the potability of the water leaving it.
- Covers
- The manufacturer's declaration that a product conforms to the applicable EU directives — for this catalog usually machinery safety, or the low-voltage and EMC directives for powered equipment.
- Does not cover
- Drinking-water materials safety, treatment performance, or product quality.
- Scope
- CE is affixed on the manufacturer's own declaration of conformity, never as a third-party product listing. Some conformity routes do involve a notified body; most in this catalog do not. Ask for the Declaration of Conformity and read which directives it actually names.
- Covers
- The manufacturer's quality-management system — that documented processes exist and are externally audited.
- Does not cover
- Any property, performance or safety characteristic of the product itself.
- Scope
- A supplier can hold ISO 9001 and still ship equipment unsuited to your duty. Treat it as evidence about the organisation, never about the equipment.
- Covers
- Aesthetic effects — chlorine taste and odour, and particulate reduction at a stated reduction class.
- Does not cover
- Health-related contaminants; those fall under NSF/ANSI 53.
- Scope
- An aesthetic certification is routinely mistaken for a health claim. The two standards are tested separately, and a product may carry one without the other.
Not on the public catalog today — project-specified, available on request.
- Covers
- Health-effects contaminant reduction — lead, VOCs, cysts and similar — with each claim listed individually.
- Does not cover
- Any contaminant not named on the listing.
- Scope
- The listing enumerates specific contaminants at specific challenge levels. “Certified to NSF/ANSI 53” without the contaminant list is not a specification.
Not on the public catalog today — project-specified, available on request.
- Covers
- Point-of-use reverse-osmosis drinking-water system performance, including TDS reduction and any additional listed claims.
- Does not cover
- A bare membrane element outside the certified system, an industrial or commercial RO skid, and any contaminant not on the listing.
- Scope
- The certification attaches to a point-of-use system as configured. Substituting a membrane, housing or post-filter can take an assembly outside the listing it was bought for, and demanding a 58 listing of an industrial skid asks for a mark the standard does not cover. A membrane element can also be listed to 58 as a component for material requirements only — that listing says nothing about the element's own rejection or flow.
- Covers
- Lead content of the wetted surfaces of drinking-water system, component, and fitting materials, verified against the U.S. federal "lead-free" weighted-average threshold.
- Does not cover
- Contaminant reduction, treatment performance, or any materials-safety claim beyond lead content — that broader scope is NSF/ANSI 61.
- Scope
- A lead-content mark, not a general materials-safety mark. A listing under 372 does not substitute for 61 where the wider materials-safety standard is what's specified.
Not on the public catalog today — project-specified, available on request.
- Covers
- Safety of industrial control equipment and the panels built from it, and restriction of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.
- Does not cover
- Anything about the water — no materials safety, no treatment performance, no disinfection claim.
- Scope
- These marks sit beside water standards on a datasheet and are easily read as part of the same assurance. They address the panel, not the process.
- Covers
- Deutscher Verein des Gas- und Wasserfaches — the German gas-and-water industry association's approval scheme. For a UV disinfection system, that means the reactor's construction and disinfection performance tested against the German national requirements for that equipment class.
- Does not cover
- Performance or materials outside the tested equipment class, and it carries no automatic recognition outside Germany — a DVGW listing is not itself an NSF/ANSI or CE claim.
- Scope
- Confirm the certificate names the exact model variant. A family name does not extend a listing to every configuration sold under it — some variants in a range may carry no DVGW listing at all.
- Covers
- Schweizerischer Verein des Gas- und Wasserfaches — the Swiss analogue to DVGW, applied here to UV disinfection equipment tested against the Swiss national requirements for that equipment class.
- Does not cover
- Performance or materials outside the tested equipment class; a Swiss listing carries no automatic recognition outside Switzerland.
- Scope
- Confirm the certificate names the exact model variant. A family name does not extend a listing to every configuration sold under it — some variants in a range may carry no SVGW listing at all.
- Covers
- The US EPA's Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual — the design and dose-validation methodology for UV reactors used in drinking-water treatment that a manufacturer states its testing follows.
- Does not cover
- It is guidance, not a certifying body with its own registry. “UVDGM” on a datasheet is a claim of methodology alignment, not a listing number the way NSF/ANSI issues one.
- Scope
- Ask which validation report the claim rests on and which model it covers — UVDGM alignment stated for one variant is not evidence for a sibling variant.
- Covers
- Attestation de Conformité Sanitaire — the French national attestation that materials in contact with drinking water do not compromise its health safety, required for water-contact equipment sold into the French market.
- Does not cover
- Treatment or disinfection performance. Like NSF/ANSI 61 (whose entry above already names ACS as an analogue, never an equivalent), it addresses material contact safety, not log-reduction or throughput.
- Scope
- A national scheme recognised in France; it does not substitute for NSF/ANSI 61 where that is the specified requirement, and acceptance of a given scheme is decided per project and per authority.
Not on the public catalog today — project-specified, available on request.
| Mark | What it examines | Who attests |
|---|---|---|
| NSF/ANSI 61 | Materials in contact with drinking water | Third-party listing |
| NSF/ANSI 55 | UV disinfection system performance | Third-party listing |
| NSF/ANSI 44 | Softener performance and materials | Third-party listing |
| CE | Conformity with the applicable EU directives | Manufacturer self-declaration |
| ISO 9001 | The manufacturer's quality-management system | Third-party audit of the system |
| NSF/ANSI 42 | Aesthetic reduction performance | Third-party listing |
| NSF/ANSI 53 | Health-effects reduction performance | Third-party listing |
| NSF/ANSI 58 | Point-of-use reverse-osmosis system performance | Third-party listing |
| NSF/ANSI 372 | Lead content of wetted materials | Third-party listing |
| UL 508 · cETLus · CSA C22.2 · RoHS | The control panel and its electronics | Third-party for the safety marks; self-declared for RoHS |
| DVGW | Equipment conformity to German gas-and-water industry requirements | Third-party listing (DVGW) |
| SVGW | Equipment conformity to Swiss gas-and-water industry requirements | Third-party listing (SVGW) |
| UVDGM | UV reactor dose-validation methodology | Manufacturer-stated guidance alignment |
| ACS | Materials in contact with drinking water (French scheme) | Third-party listing (ACS) |
A filter with no drinking-water listing, and why that is correct
The Amiad Spin Klin disc filter on this catalog carries a CE marking and no NSF/ANSI 61 listing. Read through the third rule, that is not a gap in the product — it is a statement about its duty.
The filter is specified for irrigation and industrial process water. Its CE marking speaks to mechanical safety under the applicable directive. NSF/ANSI 61 governs materials in contact with drinking water, which is not the duty this filter is sold for. A listing it does not need would tell you nothing, and its absence should not cost it a place on your shortlist.
The question that does matter is the one the absence invites: what is the water for, downstream of this filter? If the answer is potable supply, the materials question moves to the components that actually touch it.
How a product gets onto this catalog
The same standard, turned on ourselves. This is the evidence ladder we hold a catalog record to, and the verdict we record against it when a rung cannot be reached.
- 01The manufacturer's own product page for the specific model.
- 02The manufacturer's own datasheet or brochure PDF.
- 03The manufacturer's family or series page, where a model page does not exist.
- 04A distributor's published documentation, where it reproduces the certificate number and the issuing body.
Marketplace aggregators and general retailers are not accepted as sources. A certificate claim needs a first-party document; a dealer-hosted PDF does not qualify.
- VERIFIED
- A first-party source states it plainly.
- PROVISIONAL
- Supported, but the source is indirect or partial.
- NEEDS_CONFIRMATION
- Recorded against the product, not yet evidenced.
- NO_SOURCE_FOUND
- Searched and not found. The record says so.
Publishing the vocabulary is what makes the standard checkable. A certification audit of the public catalog is open at the time of writing: ask for the verdict on any record you are specifying, and we will tell you which of these four it carries.
Inclusion in this catalog is not a claim of formal partnership, authorised distribution, or exclusive representation with any manufacturer. Where a brand is listed, it is listed as equipment we can source and specify — the commercial relationship behind it is a separate question, and one we answer in writing rather than by implication.
Where we operate, and what we put in writing
Lead time, spares holding and warranty routing are commitments rather than facts about a product. If they appear on a web page they are marketing; if they appear on a quotation they are terms.
What determines them is your application, not our catalog: the duty and flow, the model family once it is fixed, the destination market, and whether a certificate pack is required for handover. Those four answers change a lead time more than any figure we could publish in advance.
So we confirm them per enquiry, against the specific configuration, and we put them on the quotation where they can be held to.
ASEAN coverage
- SingaporeSingapore · SG
- MalaysiaKuala Lumpur · MY
- IndonesiaJakarta · ID
Confirmed at quotation
- Capex band
- Lead time
- Service coverage
- Commissioning
- Spares holding
- Warranty
- Payment terms
What to send us, and what to ask for back
An enquiry is a specification exchange. Here is exactly what ours captures, and the documents worth demanding from any supplier before you sign anything off.
- Name and company
- Email and phone
- Market — Singapore, Malaysia or Indonesia
- Your application, duty and constraints
It routes to the team for your market and returns a reference number. A product with no published datasheet carries a one-tap documentation request instead.
- The certificate number and the body that issued it
- The model family the listing actually covers
- Issue and expiry dates
- The standard number — not a bare claim of certification
Ask for the certificate, not the badge. A supplier who cannot produce the listing behind a mark has told you something useful.
Send the specification.
Tell us the duty, the market and the constraints. We will come back with the configuration, the documents behind it, and the terms in writing.